Complex Problem: You Solved
Q: ๐ง๐ฒ๐น๐น ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐บ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐?
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ (๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐น๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ) Candidate: "Well, I built this React app with..." Interviewer: "No, I mean a PROBLEM. Something that was broken, users were complaining, or the business was losing money." Candidate: "Um... I guess when my components were re-rendering too much?" Interviewer: Internal eye roll
The Questions That Separate Junior Devs From Experts:
๐ญ. ๐ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฌ% ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐. ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ด ๐๐ต๐ถ๐?
โ Bad: I'd check the console...
โ Good: First, I'd check error monitoring tools, reproduce the issue, then implement feature flags to isolate the problem...
๐ฎ. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐. ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐'๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต?
โ Bad: I'd rewrite everything...
โ Good: I'd evaluate the risk versus impact, create a refactoring plan, and implement it incrementally...
๐ฏ. ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐น๐ผ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐๐?
โ Bad: Use React.memo everywhere...
โ Good: I'd profile the app, identify bottlenecks, implement virtualization if needed, and consider server-side solutions...
๐ฐ. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฃ๐. ๐ช๐ฎ๐น๐ธ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐ถ๐.
โ Bad: I'd read the docs...
โ Good: I'd use tools like Postman to test endpoints and create wrapper functions with error handling.
๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐ข๐ช:
A bug you fixed (What was broken? How did you find it? Impact?)
A performance improvement (Before/after metrics)
A feature you built (Why was it needed? Challenges faced?)
A refactoring you did (What was the mess? How did you clean it?)
Last updated